Consensus Within, Competition Between: Decentralized LLM Teams for Perimeter Defense
The use of large language models (LLMs) to coordinate multi-agent teams raises a fundamental architectural question: whether task allocation should be centralized in a single LLM controller or distributed across autonomous LLM agents, particularly when communication is unreliable. In a deliberately…
Authors: Khawaja Abaid Ullah , Ananya Acharya , Mohammad Javad Khojasteh
View a PDF of the paper titled Consensus Within, Competition Between: Decentralized LLM Teams for Perimeter Defense, by Khawaja Abaid Ullah and 2 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract: The use of large language models (LLMs) to coordinate multi-agent teams raises a fundamental architectural question: whether task allocation should be centralized in a single LLM controller or distributed across autonomous LLM agents, particularly when communication is unreliable. In a deliberately simplified perimeter-defense simulation against LLM-controlled intruders, we compared a central commander, an auction-based consensus team and independent agents under five network conditions. Breach rates were 15% for the consensus team, 32% for the commander and 29% for independent agents, and of the different network conditions, only limited radio range changed a team's breach rate, raising the commander's. In consensus team, giving a low-cost LLM more authority over the bid computation raised breaches by 38 percentage points. With birds and civilian drones in airspace, we added a photograph for each to the input text state. Only the near-frontier model treated them apart from intruders. Intruders disguised as existing taxidermy bird drones were mistook as birds by both low-cost and near-frontier LLMs, going unpursued in 59-61% of near-frontier decisions (1-16% before). However, a one-sentence forewarning in the prompt lowered it to 0-25%. We find that LLM team with a dedicated external conflict resolution protocol results in fewest breaches. Code: this https URL .
Comments:
88 pages (33 main text and references, 55 supplementary material), 7 main figures. Code: this https URL
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Machine Learning (cs.LG); Robotics (cs.RO)
Cite as:
arXiv:2610.41044 [cs.AI]
(or
arXiv:2610.41044v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.41044
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Khawaja Abaid Ullah [ view email ]
[v1]
Thu, 29 Oct 2026 22:34:13 UTC (2,771 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Consensus Within, Competition Between: Decentralized LLM Teams for Perimeter Defense, by Khawaja Abaid Ullah and 2 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Additional Features
Audio Summary
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev
next >
new
recent
| 2026-10
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.LG
cs.RO
References & Citations
SciX
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate ( What is Replicate? )
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )
本文内容由 ai007 从公开渠道聚合,版权归原作者所有。若原文已删除或变更, 以原文站为准;本站存档仅为便于查阅而保留。