Counterfactual Pairwise Augmentation Improves Small Pointwise LLM Judges

arXiv cs.AI 约 12 分钟读完

Agentic systems increasingly gate individual steps with a pointwise judge that scores a response against a criterion. Small language models are attractive for this role because they can be served and specialized efficiently. Such a judge must locate the criterion's decision boundary, but pointwise l…

Authors: Mohammad Zangooei , Peyvand Teymoori , Mohammad Robati Shirzad , Soroosh Shahtalebi

View a PDF of the paper titled Counterfactual Pairwise Augmentation Improves Small Pointwise LLM Judges, by Mohammad Zangooei and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

Abstract: Agentic systems increasingly gate individual steps with a pointwise judge that scores a response against a criterion. Small language models are attractive for this role because they can be served and specialized efficiently. Such a judge must locate the criterion's decision boundary, but pointwise labels under-determine that boundary in fine-tuning: labeled responses to different queries differ along many dimensions at once, so they do not reveal which features decide the label. We introduce CPA (Counterfactual Pairwise Augmentation), which makes the deciding difference explicit in training. For each pointwise item, CPA synthesizes and audits a counterfactual response to the same query intended to carry the opposite label. It frames the accepted pair as a pairwise task asking which of the two responses satisfies the criterion. The judge is fine-tuned jointly on both pointwise and pairwise datasets and deployed in pointwise mode only. A second-order analysis shows when this should outperform the prevailing strategy of merging separately trained pointwise and pairwise experts: merging moves every parameter direction toward the pairwise expert by the same fraction, whereas joint training can hold the pointwise optimum wherever the pairwise loss is flat and absorb its curvature where it is sharp. This is the regime that CPA's same-source, counterfactually minimal pairwise view is designed to produce. On separate Qwen3-8B LoRA adapters for six binary criteria, CPA improves criterion-averaged pointwise macro-F1 by 2.5 points over pointwise-only training and outperforms model merging on all six criteria at every tested merge weight. It also surpasses the strongest zero-shot frontier judge we evaluate, Gemini 3.6 Flash, by 11.8 points.

Comments:

Accepted at Neurips'26 workshop of small language models for agentic systems

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as:

arXiv:2610.41149 [cs.AI]

(or

arXiv:2610.41149v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.41149

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Mohammad Zangooei [ view email ]

[v1]

Fri, 30 Oct 2026 02:12:30 UTC (48 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Counterfactual Pairwise Augmentation Improves Small Pointwise LLM Judges, by Mohammad Zangooei and 3 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

< prev

next >

new

recent

| 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate ( What is Replicate? )

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |

Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )

原文标题 Counterfactual Pairwise Augmentation Improves Small Pointwise LLM Judges
引用来源 arXiv cs.AI
本地存档 2026-11-03 13:22
引用格式 Mohammad Zangooei, Peyvand Teymoori, Mohammad Robati Shirzad, Soroosh Shahtalebi. Counterfactual Pairwise Augmentation Improves Small Pointwise LLM Judges. 2026-11-02. https://www.ai007.site/news/118846

本文内容由 ai007 从公开渠道聚合,版权归原作者所有。若原文已删除或变更, 以原文站为准;本站存档仅为便于查阅而保留。