Consistency Is Not Understanding: Orbit Audits for Neural Field Weight Readers

arXiv cs.AI 约 11 分钟读完

Recognizing visual content from neural-network weights requires separating functional information from arbitrary parameter coordinates. We audit this separation with hidden-neuron permutations and positive ReLU rescalings that preserve the represented function. The study contains 480 independently f…

Authors: Sungguk Cha , Mintae Kim , Youngsub Han , Byoung-Ki Jeon , Sangyeob Lee

View a PDF of the paper titled Consistency Is Not Understanding: Orbit Audits for Neural Field Weight Readers, by Sungguk Cha and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

Abstract: Recognizing visual content from neural-network weights requires separating functional information from arbitrary parameter coordinates. We audit this separation with hidden-neuron permutations and positive ReLU rescalings that preserve the represented function. The study contains 480 independently fitted shape fields and 1,000 MNIST fields, with transformed copies grouped by origin. On shape recognition, a statistics reader falls from \ShapeRawStats\% to \ShapeJointStats\% accuracy under joint transformations; a normalized set reader retains \ShapeNormSet\% with unchanged predictions. Four small frozen language models obtain \LMRange\% raw accuracy with next-token scoring. A separate four-configuration reasoning experiment with 1,920 scored sessions obtains \FrontRawRange\% raw accuracy with generated answers, while fresh identical raw prompts disagree on \FrontRawRepeatRange\% of origins. Canonicalization makes equivalent prompts identical, but this neither establishes recognition nor guarantees identical generated responses. Joint correctness/agreement metrics, semantic-cue controls, fresh repeats, and exact-rational rounding bounds separate these failure modes. The result is an inspectable evaluation protocol for visual weight readers, with claims restricted to the tested fields, prompts, and execution configurations.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as:

arXiv:2611.05798 [cs.AI]

(or

arXiv:2611.05798v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.05798

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Sungguk Cha [ view email ]

[v1]

Wed, 4 Nov 2026 01:12:33 UTC (146 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Consistency Is Not Understanding: Orbit Audits for Neural Field Weight Readers, by Sungguk Cha and 4 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

< prev

next >

new

recent

| 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate ( What is Replicate? )

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |

Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )

原文标题 Consistency Is Not Understanding: Orbit Audits for Neural Field Weight Readers
引用来源 arXiv cs.AI
本地存档 2026-11-05 13:03
引用格式 Sungguk Cha, Mintae Kim, Youngsub Han, Byoung-Ki Jeon, Sangyeob Lee. Consistency Is Not Understanding: Orbit Audits for Neural Field Weight Readers. 2026-11-05. https://www.ai007.site/news/145136

本文内容由 ai007 从公开渠道聚合,版权归原作者所有。若原文已删除或变更, 以原文站为准;本站存档仅为便于查阅而保留。