Reasoning-Trace Overflow in Code Generation: An Empirical Study of Explicit Reasoning Models

Authors: Lukas Twist , Helen Yannakoudakis , Jie M. Zhang

View a PDF of the paper titled Reasoning-Trace Overflow in Code Generation: An Empirical Study of Explicit Reasoning Models, by Lukas Twist and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

Abstract: Explicit reasoning can help language models generate code, but it also introduces a practical risk: the model may spend so much of its output budget reasoning that it never produces usable code. We study this behaviour in relatively small open-weight reasoning models, framing it as reasoning-trace overflow. Across seven models and six code benchmark settings, we measure how much of a fixed 32k-token output budget is spent on reasoning, whether that reasoning improves pass@1, and whether lightweight inference-time controls can mitigate overflow. Our results show that the value of reasoning is highly conditional. Overflow is rare on simpler function-level tasks, but becomes common on harder code-generation benchmarks and for particular model families: on several model--benchmark pairs, more than half of generations exhaust the full 32k-token budget while still reasoning. Most complete overflow is associated with repetitive reasoning loops, although substantial long reasoning also occurs without looping. Disabling reasoning can therefore be competitive for overflow-prone models, simply because it ensures that an answer is produced. At the same time, reasoning remains valuable for stronger models on harder algorithmic and code-understanding tasks. Finally, prompt steering can substantially reduce overflow for some models but is inconsistent, while budgeted transitions provide more direct control and can improve both performance and token efficiency for overflow-prone models. These findings suggest that explicit reasoning should be treated as a controllable resource for code generation, rather than an always-on capability.

Comments:

12 pages, 6 figures, 1 table

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Software Engineering (cs.SE)

Cite as:

arXiv:2611.06095 [cs.AI]

(or

arXiv:2611.06095v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.06095

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Lukas Twist [ view email ]

[v1]

Wed, 4 Nov 2026 07:42:05 UTC (1,264 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Reasoning-Trace Overflow in Code Generation: An Empirical Study of Explicit Reasoning Models, by Lukas Twist and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

< prev

next >

new

recent

| 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs

cs.SE

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate ( What is Replicate? )

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |

Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )