SafeStart: Mitigating the Overlooked Safety Cost of Active Expert Reduction in MoE LLM Serving

arXiv cs.AI 约 13 分钟读完

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models send each token through a few of many expert subnetworks. Serving methods make these models faster by running even fewer experts per token, and they are validated on accuracy benchmarks. We show that these methods can weaken the model's refusal of harmful req…

Authors: Erfan Baghaei Potraghloo , Saeid Shokoufa , Seyedarmin Azizi , Arya Fayyazi , Souvik Kundu , Mehdi Kamal , Massoud Pedram

View a PDF of the paper titled SafeStart: Mitigating the Overlooked Safety Cost of Active Expert Reduction in MoE LLM Serving, by Erfan Baghaei Potraghloo and 6 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models send each token through a few of many expert subnetworks. Serving methods make these models faster by running even fewer experts per token, and they are validated on accuracy benchmarks. We show that these methods can weaken the model's refusal of harmful requests, and we introduce SafeStart, which largely restores refusal while keeping most of the speedup. In vLLM on one RTX A6000, keeping about two thirds of the selected experts speeds up offline decoding by 15 to 28% at batch size 8. We find that, at this setting, under a jailbreak that tells the model not to refuse, the share of harmful requests that the model answers rises by 18.4 percentage points on Qwen1.5-MoE, 9.5 on OLMoE, and 6.6 on DeepSeek-V2-Lite, the three of nine models where it rises significantly, while MMLU accuracy drops by less than two points. We discover that most of this increase arises while the model processes the prompt and generates its first few tokens. SafeStart therefore runs all experts for the prompt and the first eight generated tokens, and the reduced set of experts afterwards, through a fused kernel in vLLM. With experts removed, SafeStart keeps at least 85% of the offline decode speedup at batch sizes 8 and 32 and brings the change under this jailbreak to between -2.1 and +1.3 points for three expert-reduction methods on these three models. On 889 held-out requests, in an analysis fixed before generation, truncation raises harmful compliance by 5.8 to 21.4 points, and SafeStart leaves a rise of 0.6 to 2.6 points, non-inferior to the original model on two of the three models. Our results show that faster MoE serving need not cost safety: a serving system can keep most of the gain from running fewer experts by running all of them at the start of each response, and it should test refusal, not only accuracy, before it enables such a method.

Comments:

40 pages, 13 figures, 41 tables

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as:

arXiv:2611.06147 [cs.AI]

(or

arXiv:2611.06147v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.06147

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Erfan Baghaei Potraghloo [ view email ]

[v1]

Wed, 4 Nov 2026 08:31:01 UTC (1,719 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled SafeStart: Mitigating the Overlooked Safety Cost of Active Expert Reduction in MoE LLM Serving, by Erfan Baghaei Potraghloo and 6 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

< prev

next >

new

recent

| 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs

cs.LG

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate ( What is Replicate? )

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |

Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )

原文标题 SafeStart: Mitigating the Overlooked Safety Cost of Active Expert Reduction in MoE LLM Serving
引用来源 arXiv cs.AI
本地存档 2026-11-05 13:03
引用格式 Erfan Baghaei Potraghloo, Saeid Shokoufa, Seyedarmin Azizi, Arya Fayyazi, Souvik. SafeStart: Mitigating the Overlooked Safety Cost of Active Expert Reduction in MoE LLM Serving. 2026-11-05. https://www.ai007.site/news/145156

本文内容由 ai007 从公开渠道聚合,版权归原作者所有。若原文已删除或变更, 以原文站为准;本站存档仅为便于查阅而保留。