The Intrusion Pathway: How Non-Evidential Context Degrades Language Model Performance

arXiv cs.AI 约 12 分钟读完

Language models lose accuracy when a prompt contains non-evidential context: irrelevant statements from unrelated domains, or random off-distribution tokens, with no competing answer and no semantic overlap with the query. Such noise pervades retrieval-augmented, tool-using, and long-context deploym…

Authors: Dikshant Kukreja , Gautam Gupta , Avni Mittal , Avinash Anand , Kritarth Prasad , Zhengkui Wang , Timothy Liu , Rajiv Ratn Shah , Aik Beng Ng , Simon See , Erik Cambria

View a PDF of the paper titled The Intrusion Pathway: How Non-Evidential Context Degrades Language Model Performance, by Dikshant Kukreja and 10 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

Abstract: Language models lose accuracy when a prompt contains non-evidential context: irrelevant statements from unrelated domains, or random off-distribution tokens, with no competing answer and no semantic overlap with the query. Such noise pervades retrieval-augmented, tool-using, and long-context deployments, yet the failure has lacked a mechanistic account. We trace the corruption to the Intrusion Pathway, which starts with MLPs enriching both query-subject and irrelevant-token representations, parroting heads carry prefix-token content to the prediction position, and relational readers largely avoid unrelated sources. Nevertheless, preserved subject enrichment and selective reading do not prevent intrusion in the broader computation. We then localize part of this interference to a sparse set of attention heads, which we call intrusion heads. Their prefix-derived writes promote distractor-related content, while their reduced support for the correct answer arises primarily from weaker non-prefix contributions rather than direct suppression by the prefix. The same heads transfer across tasks and distractor types and are largely weight-disjoint from the heads that integrate relevant contextual evidence, enabling a class-conditional intervention. Replacing the corrupted last-token residual with its clean counterpart, an oracle probe that requires a matched clean forward pass, recovers 97.6% on average of the distractor-induced drop across four downstream tasks. A deployable mask level knockout of about ten heads, roughly 1% of the model's attention heads, recovers 57% at bounded cost to helpful context.

Comments:

32 pages, 25 figures, 29 tables. Dikshant Kukreja and Gautam Gupta contributed equally. Website: this https URL Code: this https URL

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as:

arXiv:2611.07778 [cs.AI]

(or

arXiv:2611.07778v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.07778

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Dikshant Kukreja [ view email ]

[v1]

Thu, 5 Nov 2026 10:18:07 UTC (1,075 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled The Intrusion Pathway: How Non-Evidential Context Degrades Language Model Performance, by Dikshant Kukreja and 10 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

< prev

next >

new

recent

| 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate ( What is Replicate? )

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |

Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )

原文标题 The Intrusion Pathway: How Non-Evidential Context Degrades Language Model Performance
引用来源 arXiv cs.AI
本地存档 2026-11-06 13:05
引用格式 Dikshant Kukreja, Gautam Gupta, Avni Mittal, Avinash Anand, Kritarth Prasad, Zhe. The Intrusion Pathway: How Non-Evidential Context Degrades Language Model Performance. 2026-11-06. https://www.ai007.site/news/159097

本文内容由 ai007 从公开渠道聚合,版权归原作者所有。若原文已删除或变更, 以原文站为准;本站存档仅为便于查阅而保留。