Responsible GenAI Use During Active Armed Conflict: Evidence from Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms

arXiv cs.AI 约 12 分钟读完

Armed conflict can increase the value of Generative AI (GenAI) while undermining the conditions required for its responsible use. Yet the perspectives of community-based humanitarian responders working under these conditions remain underrepresented in responsible AI research. We examine GenAI use in…

Authors: Dalia Ali , Yearin Lee , Cheng Yu , Ro Encarnación , Alsanosi Adam , Danaé Metaxa , Ingmar Weber , Orestis Papakyriakopoulos

View a PDF of the paper titled Responsible GenAI Use During Active Armed Conflict: Evidence from Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms, by Dalia Ali and 7 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

Abstract: Armed conflict can increase the value of Generative AI (GenAI) while undermining the conditions required for its responsible use. Yet the perspectives of community-based humanitarian responders working under these conditions remain underrepresented in responsible AI research. We examine GenAI use in Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms (ERRs), a community-led humanitarian network, through an exploratory survey of 89 respondents and 15 semi-structured interviews with GenAI users and non-users. War reconfigures GenAI's role, making it most useful where its outputs are hardest to verify. ERR responders turned to GenAI when conflict made human expertise difficult or dangerous to reach. However, participants cautioned that GenAI could not independently establish rapidly changing local conditions, and that relying on its outputs could lead to harmful decisions when human verification was difficult. Risks arose before GenAI was used. For some volunteers, carrying a phone or accessing the internet could expose them to danger. Others were concerned that sharing sensitive beneficiary or operational information with GenAI could put people at risk. Participants feared that AI-assisted reports could undermine their credibility with donors, whose funding sustains the food and medical aid ERRs provide. Access to GenAI was uneven, and volunteers using it sometimes relied on colleagues with relevant expertise or local knowledge to verify its results. Our findings show that responsible use of GenAI during conflict depends not only on model performance or individual adoption, but also on whether responders can safely access these tools, verify their outputs against local conditions, and recognize when limiting or avoiding GenAI is the more responsible choice.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)

Cite as:

arXiv:2611.07874 [cs.AI]

(or

arXiv:2611.07874v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.07874

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Dalia Ali [ view email ]

[v1]

Thu, 5 Nov 2026 11:52:14 UTC (1,672 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Responsible GenAI Use During Active Armed Conflict: Evidence from Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms, by Dalia Ali and 7 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

< prev

next >

new

recent

| 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs

cs.HC

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate ( What is Replicate? )

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |

Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )

原文标题 Responsible GenAI Use During Active Armed Conflict: Evidence from Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms
引用来源 arXiv cs.AI
本地存档 2026-11-06 13:05
引用格式 Dalia Ali, Yearin Lee, Cheng Yu, Ro Encarnaci\'on, Alsanosi Adam, Dana\'e Metaxa. Responsible GenAI Use During Active Armed Conflict: Evidence from Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms. 2026-11-06. https://www.ai007.site/news/159100

本文内容由 ai007 从公开渠道聚合,版权归原作者所有。若原文已删除或变更, 以原文站为准;本站存档仅为便于查阅而保留。