When Imperfect Automated Fact-Checking Backfires: Social Learning in the Presence of Misinformation
Automated fact-checking tools, cheap and fast but imperfect, are increasingly available on social platforms. We study when such tools can backfire in a sequential social learning model of misinformation. Agents observe an article's reliability and their predecessors' actions, which indicate whether…
Authors: Zixuan Liu , Ming Cao
View a PDF of the paper titled When Imperfect Automated Fact-Checking Backfires: Social Learning in the Presence of Misinformation, by Zixuan Liu and Ming Cao
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract: Automated fact-checking tools, cheap and fast but imperfect, are increasingly available on social platforms. We study when such tools can backfire in a sequential social learning model of misinformation. Agents observe an article's reliability and their predecessors' actions, which indicate whether they liked or disliked the article. They may also pay to fact-check it. We examine how welfare, defined as the probability of a correct cascade, changes when a free, error-prone automated tool supplements costly but perfectly accurate manual fact-checking. Two opposing effects arise. Broader use of fact-checking helps agents escape wrong cascades. At the same time, errors from the automated tool can mislead agents who would otherwise have verified the article perfectly, reducing the likelihood of correct cascades. We prove that adding the tool strictly lowers welfare for articles of intermediate reliability when truthful articles are not too informative and manual checking is sufficiently costly. Simulations show that the tool can help on either side of the intermediate range, and that it improves on manual-only checking on average only above a threshold accuracy.
Comments:
8 pages, 5 figures
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Systems and Control (eess.SY)
Cite as:
arXiv:2611.08053 [cs.AI]
(or
arXiv:2611.08053v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.08053
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Zixuan Liu [ view email ]
[v1]
Thu, 5 Nov 2026 14:10:05 UTC (283 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled When Imperfect Automated Fact-Checking Backfires: Social Learning in the Presence of Misinformation, by Zixuan Liu and Ming Cao
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Additional Features
Audio Summary
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev
next >
new
recent
| 2026-11
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.SY
eess
eess.SY
References & Citations
SciX
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate ( What is Replicate? )
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )
本文内容由 ai007 从公开渠道聚合,版权归原作者所有。若原文已删除或变更, 以原文站为准;本站存档仅为便于查阅而保留。