When Imperfect Automated Fact-Checking Backfires: Social Learning in the Presence of Misinformation

arXiv cs.AI 约 10 分钟读完

Automated fact-checking tools, cheap and fast but imperfect, are increasingly available on social platforms. We study when such tools can backfire in a sequential social learning model of misinformation. Agents observe an article's reliability and their predecessors' actions, which indicate whether…

Authors: Zixuan Liu , Ming Cao

View a PDF of the paper titled When Imperfect Automated Fact-Checking Backfires: Social Learning in the Presence of Misinformation, by Zixuan Liu and Ming Cao

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

Abstract: Automated fact-checking tools, cheap and fast but imperfect, are increasingly available on social platforms. We study when such tools can backfire in a sequential social learning model of misinformation. Agents observe an article's reliability and their predecessors' actions, which indicate whether they liked or disliked the article. They may also pay to fact-check it. We examine how welfare, defined as the probability of a correct cascade, changes when a free, error-prone automated tool supplements costly but perfectly accurate manual fact-checking. Two opposing effects arise. Broader use of fact-checking helps agents escape wrong cascades. At the same time, errors from the automated tool can mislead agents who would otherwise have verified the article perfectly, reducing the likelihood of correct cascades. We prove that adding the tool strictly lowers welfare for articles of intermediate reliability when truthful articles are not too informative and manual checking is sufficiently costly. Simulations show that the tool can help on either side of the intermediate range, and that it improves on manual-only checking on average only above a threshold accuracy.

Comments:

8 pages, 5 figures

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Systems and Control (eess.SY)

Cite as:

arXiv:2611.08053 [cs.AI]

(or

arXiv:2611.08053v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.08053

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zixuan Liu [ view email ]

[v1]

Thu, 5 Nov 2026 14:10:05 UTC (283 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled When Imperfect Automated Fact-Checking Backfires: Social Learning in the Presence of Misinformation, by Zixuan Liu and Ming Cao

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

< prev

next >

new

recent

| 2026-11

Change to browse by:

cs

cs.SY

eess

eess.SY

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate ( What is Replicate? )

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |

Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )

原文标题 When Imperfect Automated Fact-Checking Backfires: Social Learning in the Presence of Misinformation
引用来源 arXiv cs.AI
本地存档 2026-11-06 13:05
引用格式 Zixuan Liu, Ming Cao. When Imperfect Automated Fact-Checking Backfires: Social Learning in the Presence of Misinformation. 2026-11-06. https://www.ai007.site/news/159111

本文内容由 ai007 从公开渠道聚合,版权归原作者所有。若原文已删除或变更, 以原文站为准;本站存档仅为便于查阅而保留。