PPO vs. SAC: A Comparative Study for Cooperative Motion Control of Dual-Arm Space Robots

arXiv cs.AI 约 13 分钟读完

The growing population of orbital debris has intensified interest in active debris removal and on-orbit servicing, for which dual-arm space manipulators offer improved grasping stability and load distribution relative to single-arm systems. However, coordinating two manipulators under inter-arm coll…

Authors: Nasim Fallahiarezoodar , Zheng H. Zhu

View a PDF of the paper titled PPO vs. SAC: A Comparative Study for Cooperative Motion Control of Dual-Arm Space Robots, by Nasim Fallahiarezoodar and Zheng H. Zhu

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

Abstract: The growing population of orbital debris has intensified interest in active debris removal and on-orbit servicing, for which dual-arm space manipulators offer improved grasping stability and load distribution relative to single-arm systems. However, coordinating two manipulators under inter-arm collision avoidance, orientation alignment, and sensing uncertainty remains challenging. This paper develops a coordinated reinforcement learning framework for cooperative motion planning of a dual-arm space manipulator in a target-reaching task with inter-arm collision-avoidance constraints. A centralized state representation combines joint-space, end-effector, and target-relative information, while a multi-objective reward function promotes target-reaching accuracy, orientation alignment, motion smoothness, synchronized task completion, and collision avoidance. Within this framework, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) are compared as representative on-policy and off-policy algorithms, and the learned policies are further evaluated for generalization to previously unseen target configurations. Across five random seeds, SAC substantially outperforms PPO within the considered fixed-base simulation scenarios: it reaches an 80% success threshold in every seed (median 1.6M environment steps) whereas PPO does not reach it within a 4M-step budget, and it attains a higher mean success rate (78.6% versus 7.4%) with lower position and orientation errors and tighter bimanual synchronization. Both algorithms degrade on unseen boundary targets, but SAC retains most of its performance while PPO's collapses. The results also expose a failure mode of PPO: under the two-phase shaped reward, it tends to converge to a reward-loitering local optimum rather than committing to the precision task. This behavior highlights the sensitivity of on-policy learning to reward shaping.

Comments:

Presented at the 2026 AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Whistler, British Columbia, Canada, July 26-30, 2026. Paper AAS 26-740

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as:

arXiv:2610.32034 [cs.AI]

(or

arXiv:2610.32034v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.32034

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Nasim Fallahiarezoodar [ view email ]

[v1]

Fri, 23 Oct 2026 01:22:07 UTC (521 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled PPO vs. SAC: A Comparative Study for Cooperative Motion Control of Dual-Arm Space Robots, by Nasim Fallahiarezoodar and Zheng H. Zhu

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

< prev

next >

new

recent

| 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate ( What is Replicate? )

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |

Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )

原文标题 PPO vs. SAC: A Comparative Study for Cooperative Motion Control of Dual-Arm Space Robots
引用来源 arXiv cs.AI
本地存档 2026-10-28 15:39
引用格式 Nasim Fallahiarezoodar, Zheng H. Zhu. PPO vs. SAC: A Comparative Study for Cooperative Motion Control of Dual-Arm Space Robots. 2026-10-26. https://www.ai007.site/news/35697

本文内容由 ai007 从公开渠道聚合,版权归原作者所有。若原文已删除或变更, 以原文站为准;本站存档仅为便于查阅而保留。