Correct Answers, Closed Gates: SolveBind for GUI Agents at the Verification Barrier

arXiv cs.AI 约 12 分钟读完

Websites and applications deploy CAPTCHAs and anti-automation mechanisms that use behavioral signals such as interaction trajectories and timing, not outcomes alone, to distinguish humans from automated agents. We call these protected GUI environments, where correctly solving a verification task is…

Authors: Xinhao Song , Haoxuan Peng , Su Su , Hongliang Wu , Sirui Song , Gongshen Liu , Linfeng Zhang , Dongrui Liu

View a PDF of the paper titled Correct Answers, Closed Gates: SolveBind for GUI Agents at the Verification Barrier, by Xinhao Song and 7 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

Abstract: Websites and applications deploy CAPTCHAs and anti-automation mechanisms that use behavioral signals such as interaction trajectories and timing, not outcomes alone, to distinguish humans from automated agents. We call these protected GUI environments, where correctly solving a verification task is insufficient for end-to-end task completion. Agents must turn solver outputs into accepted interactions and adapt execution to runtime feedback under time constraints. We introduce SolveBind, a GUI-agent framework combining hierarchical solving with runtime supervision. A hierarchical solving tree decomposes verification into interdependent Perceive, Ground, Solve, Act, and Verify capabilities. A runtime supervisor grounds action commitments in tool-derived evidence, revises them as evidence arrives, and mediates execution under explicit recovery budgets. Across nine CAPTCHA task families and nine backbone models, SolveBind achieves the highest success rate on eight backbones, outperforming the strongest baseline by 13.3-34.5 percentage points. It achieves the highest success rate on all six AndroidWorld backbones. In a paired GPT-5.5 analysis, MobileAgent produces correct answers but fails dynamic verification on 13 of 90 tasks; SolveBind succeeds on seven of these tasks. With automatic submission, removing binding reduces success from 82.22% to 71.56% and increases latency and token usage. Recovery caps reduce execution cost with a small observed success trade-off: removing them raises success from 82.22% to 83.56%, while increasing latency and token usage to 3.7x and 2.4x their full-supervision values, respectively. These results support evidence-grounded execution control while identifying a success-cost trade-off in recovery and failure boundaries of heuristic submission rules.

Comments:

41 pages, 16 figures

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as:

arXiv:2610.32223 [cs.AI]

(or

arXiv:2610.32223v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.32223

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Xinhao Song [ view email ]

[v1]

Fri, 23 Oct 2026 06:27:37 UTC (21,034 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Correct Answers, Closed Gates: SolveBind for GUI Agents at the Verification Barrier, by Xinhao Song and 7 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

< prev

next >

new

recent

| 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate ( What is Replicate? )

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |

Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )

原文标题 Correct Answers, Closed Gates: SolveBind for GUI Agents at the Verification Barrier
引用来源 arXiv cs.AI
本地存档 2026-10-28 15:39
引用格式 Xinhao Song, Haoxuan Peng, Su Su, Hongliang Wu, Sirui Song, Gongshen Liu, Linfen. Correct Answers, Closed Gates: SolveBind for GUI Agents at the Verification Barrier. 2026-10-26. https://www.ai007.site/news/35716

本文内容由 ai007 从公开渠道聚合,版权归原作者所有。若原文已删除或变更, 以原文站为准;本站存档仅为便于查阅而保留。