Jointly Modeling Preferences and Imperfect Decision-Making in Large Language Models
Do preferences Large Language Models (LLMs) express in standard elicitation tasks predict their strategic behaviour? LLM agents interacting with humans and other AI systems face potentially conflicting objectives, such as individual welfare, group welfare, and environmental concerns. Prior work char…
Authors: Axel Abels , Elias Fernández Domingos , Tom Lenaerts
View a PDF of the paper titled Jointly Modeling Preferences and Imperfect Decision-Making in Large Language Models, by Axel Abels and 2 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract: Do preferences Large Language Models (LLMs) express in standard elicitation tasks predict their strategic behaviour? LLM agents interacting with humans and other AI systems face potentially conflicting objectives, such as individual welfare, group welfare, and environmental concerns. Prior work characterizes LLM preferences through behavioral-economic and psychological elicitation or strategic games, but rarely tests consistency across settings and prediction in other strategic environments. This requires modeling how competing objectives jointly shape behavior, whereas existing approaches typically measure preference dimensions in isolation. Drawing on utility theory, we introduce the Preference-Behavior Model (PBM), which combines a preference representation with mechanisms capturing imperfect utility maximization. We formulate estimation as an inverse-game problem, jointly inferring preferences and behavioral parameters from observed choices. We evaluate PBM in three social dilemmas that expose conflicting motives: a Public Goods Game, a Collective-Risk Dilemma, and a Common-Pool Resource dilemma. We find that while preferences estimated from established behavioral economic elicitation instruments do not consistently predict behavior in these dilemmas, models fitted in one dilemma retain predictive value in others, suggesting that inferred preferences capture meaningful aspects of LLM decision-making that elicitation instruments may miss. Finally, we assess alignment with persona instructions, finding that inferred preferences broadly reflect intended priorities with specific divergences across dimensions, LLMs, and games being identified by our approach. Our methodology provides a framework for studying how consistently LLM preferences explain behavior, assessing alignment with intended priorities, and revealing trade-offs and behavioral patterns that standard elicitation may miss.
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)
ACM classes:
I.2.0; I.2.7; I.2.11; J.4
Cite as:
arXiv:2610.33651 [cs.AI]
(or
arXiv:2610.33651v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.33651
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Axel Abels [ view email ]
[v1]
Sat, 24 Oct 2026 13:06:54 UTC (598 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled Jointly Modeling Preferences and Imperfect Decision-Making in Large Language Models, by Axel Abels and 2 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Additional Features
Audio Summary
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev
next >
new
recent
| 2026-10
Change to browse by:
cs
cs.CL
cs.GT
References & Citations
SciX
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate ( What is Replicate? )
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )
本文内容由 ai007 从公开渠道聚合,版权归原作者所有。若原文已删除或变更, 以原文站为准;本站存档仅为便于查阅而保留。