Jointly Modeling Preferences and Imperfect Decision-Making in Large Language Models

arXiv cs.AI 约 12 分钟读完

Do preferences Large Language Models (LLMs) express in standard elicitation tasks predict their strategic behaviour? LLM agents interacting with humans and other AI systems face potentially conflicting objectives, such as individual welfare, group welfare, and environmental concerns. Prior work char…

Authors: Axel Abels , Elias Fernández Domingos , Tom Lenaerts

View a PDF of the paper titled Jointly Modeling Preferences and Imperfect Decision-Making in Large Language Models, by Axel Abels and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

Abstract: Do preferences Large Language Models (LLMs) express in standard elicitation tasks predict their strategic behaviour? LLM agents interacting with humans and other AI systems face potentially conflicting objectives, such as individual welfare, group welfare, and environmental concerns. Prior work characterizes LLM preferences through behavioral-economic and psychological elicitation or strategic games, but rarely tests consistency across settings and prediction in other strategic environments. This requires modeling how competing objectives jointly shape behavior, whereas existing approaches typically measure preference dimensions in isolation. Drawing on utility theory, we introduce the Preference-Behavior Model (PBM), which combines a preference representation with mechanisms capturing imperfect utility maximization. We formulate estimation as an inverse-game problem, jointly inferring preferences and behavioral parameters from observed choices. We evaluate PBM in three social dilemmas that expose conflicting motives: a Public Goods Game, a Collective-Risk Dilemma, and a Common-Pool Resource dilemma. We find that while preferences estimated from established behavioral economic elicitation instruments do not consistently predict behavior in these dilemmas, models fitted in one dilemma retain predictive value in others, suggesting that inferred preferences capture meaningful aspects of LLM decision-making that elicitation instruments may miss. Finally, we assess alignment with persona instructions, finding that inferred preferences broadly reflect intended priorities with specific divergences across dimensions, LLMs, and games being identified by our approach. Our methodology provides a framework for studying how consistently LLM preferences explain behavior, assessing alignment with intended priorities, and revealing trade-offs and behavioral patterns that standard elicitation may miss.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT)

ACM classes:

I.2.0; I.2.7; I.2.11; J.4

Cite as:

arXiv:2610.33651 [cs.AI]

(or

arXiv:2610.33651v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.33651

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Axel Abels [ view email ]

[v1]

Sat, 24 Oct 2026 13:06:54 UTC (598 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Jointly Modeling Preferences and Imperfect Decision-Making in Large Language Models, by Axel Abels and 2 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

< prev

next >

new

recent

| 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

cs.CL

cs.GT

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate ( What is Replicate? )

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |

Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )

原文标题 Jointly Modeling Preferences and Imperfect Decision-Making in Large Language Models
引用来源 arXiv cs.AI
本地存档 2026-10-28 16:11
引用格式 Axel Abels, Elias Fern\'andez Domingos, Tom Lenaerts. Jointly Modeling Preferences and Imperfect Decision-Making in Large Language Models. 2026-10-27. https://www.ai007.site/news/51992

本文内容由 ai007 从公开渠道聚合,版权归原作者所有。若原文已删除或变更, 以原文站为准;本站存档仅为便于查阅而保留。