All the Facts, Still the Wrong Answer: Integration Gaps in Vision-Language Models
Multimodal reasoning requires models to combine multiple pieces of evidence into decisions that satisfy all relevant constraints. Evaluations centered on final-answer accuracy leave unclear whether failures arise from reading individual facts or using them together. We study this question through th…
Authors: Yuyang Dai , Yuxia Wang , Zhuohan Xie
View a PDF of the paper titled All the Facts, Still the Wrong Answer: Integration Gaps in Vision-Language Models, by Yuyang Dai and 2 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract: Multimodal reasoning requires models to combine multiple pieces of evidence into decisions that satisfy all relevant constraints. Evaluations centered on final-answer accuracy leave unclear whether failures arise from reading individual facts or using them together. We study this question through the multi-evidence integration gap, linking local fact recovery to global decision validity on controlled subset-selection and path-finding tasks. Our evaluation combines conditional performance given correct local answers with same-grid local queries, text-oracle inputs, retrieval controls, and constraint ablations. We further examine hidden-state probes and activation replacement across network depth, token positions, and model families. Across the evaluated models, accurate local recovery coexists with substantial global failure. For example, Gemma-3-27B recovers all evaluated isolated item facts correctly but achieves only 19.75% global validity on eight-item visual instances. Probes decode information about solution membership from global-prompt states, while corresponding clean-state replacement recovers failed decisions over model-dependent depth ranges. These findings show that recovering facts and representing solution-related information are insufficient for reliable joint decisions. They motivate evaluations and model improvements that explicitly target how available evidence is combined, alongside advances in perception and model scale.
Comments:
53 pages
Subjects:
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as:
arXiv:2610.33764 [cs.AI]
(or
arXiv:2610.33764v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.33764
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Submission history
From: Yuyang Dai [ view email ]
[v1]
Sat, 24 Oct 2026 16:14:52 UTC (2,330 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
View a PDF of the paper titled All the Facts, Still the Wrong Answer: Integration Gaps in Vision-Language Models, by Yuyang Dai and 2 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
TeX Source
view license
Additional Features
Audio Summary
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev
next >
new
recent
| 2026-10
Change to browse by:
cs
References & Citations
SciX
Google Scholar
Semantic Scholar
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
BibTeX formatted citation
loading...
Data provided by:
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )
Code, Data, Media
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )
Demos
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate ( What is Replicate? )
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )
Related Papers
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )
Author
Venue
Institution
Topic
About arXivLabs
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .
Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |
Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )
本文内容由 ai007 从公开渠道聚合,版权归原作者所有。若原文已删除或变更, 以原文站为准;本站存档仅为便于查阅而保留。