RubricAtlas: Mining Type-Level Rubrics from Expert Reports to Evaluate Deep Research Agents

arXiv cs.AI 约 11 分钟读完

Deep research agents conduct multi-step Web searches and synthesise retrieved information into analytical reports. Evaluating these outputs requires checking which analyses they deliver, beyond the presence of relevant facts. Query-specific binary rubrics make individual requirements explicit, but t…

Authors: Delin Wang , Sinuo Wang , Rui Sun , Beidi Luan , Qiming Shi , Jing Li , Daxin Jiang , Zuo Bai

View a PDF of the paper titled RubricAtlas: Mining Type-Level Rubrics from Expert Reports to Evaluate Deep Research Agents, by Delin Wang and 7 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

Abstract: Deep research agents conduct multi-step Web searches and synthesise retrieved information into analytical reports. Evaluating these outputs requires checking which analyses they deliver, beyond the presence of relevant facts. Query-specific binary rubrics make individual requirements explicit, but task-level checklists may leave the overall analytical structure underexamined. We introduce RubricAtlas, which derives type-level analytical requirements from expert reports on different objects within the same research type and organises detailed checks around recurring analytical questions. The requirements give related tasks a shared standard for what to analyse, without prescribing their answers. Our framework links binary checkpoints to report passages and evaluates completeness separately from argument validity. Built from 3,079 Chinese financial research reports, RubricAtlas covers 99 research types. Reference-report selection experiments show that individual reports cover only about half of their type's analytical questions, and that selecting requirements from different reports changes evaluation scores and agent rankings. Across ten agents, two judge pipelines achieve checkpoint agreement of $\kappa$ = 0.71 and agent-ranking agreement of Kendall $\tau$ = 0.87. Controlled deletions reduce scores on the affected analyses, while padding produces no detectable increase. These findings support type-level rubrics for comparing the analytical completeness of Web deep research outputs, with individual decisions traceable to report evidence.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Computation and Language (cs.CL)

Cite as:

arXiv:2610.36878 [cs.AI]

(or

arXiv:2610.36878v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.36878

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zuo Bai [ view email ]

[v1]

Tue, 27 Oct 2026 09:18:00 UTC (188 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled RubricAtlas: Mining Type-Level Rubrics from Expert Reports to Evaluate Deep Research Agents, by Delin Wang and 7 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

< prev

next >

new

recent

| 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

cs.CL

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate ( What is Replicate? )

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |

Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )

原文标题 RubricAtlas: Mining Type-Level Rubrics from Expert Reports to Evaluate Deep Research Agents
引用来源 arXiv cs.AI
本地存档 2026-10-28 16:18
引用格式 Delin Wang, Sinuo Wang, Rui Sun, Beidi Luan, Qiming Shi, Jing Li, Daxin Jiang, Z. RubricAtlas: Mining Type-Level Rubrics from Expert Reports to Evaluate Deep Research Agents. 2026-10-28. https://www.ai007.site/news/52577

本文内容由 ai007 从公开渠道聚合,版权归原作者所有。若原文已删除或变更, 以原文站为准;本站存档仅为便于查阅而保留。