Assessing Language Models for Scientific Applications: Inertial Confinement Fusion as a Use Case

Authors: P. B. Radha , D. D. Meyerhofer , M. Bhattarai , B. Cheng , L. Diaz , C. L. Rousculp , A. G. Seaton , G. Gupta , P. Gurumurthy , V. Gutta , A. Jhunjhunwala , A. Vem , P. Cook , G. Rowe

View a PDF of the paper titled Assessing Language Models for Scientific Applications: Inertial Confinement Fusion as a Use Case, by P. B. Radha and 13 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

Abstract: Advancing language models for specialized scientific applications requires evaluations of scientific fluency, physical reasoning, and quantitative analyses. Using inertial confinement fusion (ICF) as a test case, we have developed an expert-curated benchmark of 250 questions spanning qualitative reasoning, numerical calculation, symbolic derivation, and equation formulation. Responses have been evaluated using deterministic numerical and symbolic checks together with language-model judges. We compared a variety of out-of-the-box closed-source and open-source large language models with Prospero, a model specialized through combined domain-adaptive pretraining and supervised fine-tuning for ICF. We also conducted initial retrieval-assisted evaluations. Prospero improved its aggregate score by 10.7 percentage points over its base model, with gains across all question types. Frontier models achieved the highest aggregate scores, but critical physics errors persisted, particularly in numerical calculations. We note that domain-specific performance can improve through specialization, but benchmark gains alone do not establish scientific reliability. Retrieval improved performance for a smaller model but yielded no statistically significant improvement for a frontier model. Two scientific stress tests further illustrate useful capabilities and the need for expert assessment of physical assumptions and model validity. Based on these findings, we recommend evaluating existing domain capabilities and retrieval benefits before committing to substantial additional specialization.

Comments:

33 pages, 16 figures

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

Cite as:

arXiv:2610.38024 [cs.AI]

(or

arXiv:2610.38024v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.38024

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Radha Bahukutumbi [ view email ]

[v1]

Tue, 27 Oct 2026 22:21:10 UTC (10,697 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Assessing Language Models for Scientific Applications: Inertial Confinement Fusion as a Use Case, by P. B. Radha and 13 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

< prev

next >

new

recent

| 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate ( What is Replicate? )

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |

Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )