Can Test-Time Memory Evolution Outperform Test-Time Training for Scientific Discovery?

arXiv cs.AI 约 11 分钟读完

Recent \emph{test-time training} (TTT) frameworks have enabled open-weight large language models (LLMs) to outperform inference-only frameworks powered by frontier models on scientific discovery tasks. However, TTT introduces additional computational cost for online weight updates during the discove…

Authors: Yepeng Liu , Shengmai Chen , Xuandong Zhao , Chengzhi Liu , Dawn Song , Xin Eric Wang , Yuheng Bu

View a PDF of the paper titled Can Test-Time Memory Evolution Outperform Test-Time Training for Scientific Discovery?, by Yepeng Liu and 6 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

Abstract: Recent \emph{test-time training} (TTT) frameworks have enabled open-weight large language models (LLMs) to outperform inference-only frameworks powered by frontier models on scientific discovery tasks. However, TTT introduces additional computational cost for online weight updates during the discovery process, making computational efficiency an important consideration when scaling to larger models. This motivates us to explore an efficient \emph{test-time adaptation} method for scientific discovery. We introduce \emph{Test-Time Memory Evolution} (TTME), a plug-and-play test-time adaptation method, as an alternative to TTT. TTME continually updates the external memory by distilling the experience to guide subsequent discovery without updating model weights. To have a clean comparison, we evaluate TTME and TTT under the same discovery framework, replacing only the test-time adaptation method. Our evaluation shows that TTME outperforms TTT on all five mathematical tasks, while reducing computational cost by $82.8$-$84.6\%$ in FLOPs and $47.7$-$58.4\%$ in runtime. These results establish TTME as an effective and computationally efficient alternative to TTT in the evaluated discovery settings.

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Machine Learning (cs.LG)

Cite as:

arXiv:2610.32046 [cs.AI]

(or

arXiv:2610.32046v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.32046

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yepeng Liu [ view email ]

[v1]

Fri, 23 Oct 2026 01:37:19 UTC (4,793 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Can Test-Time Memory Evolution Outperform Test-Time Training for Scientific Discovery?, by Yepeng Liu and 6 other authors

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

< prev

next >

new

recent

| 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

cs.LG

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate ( What is Replicate? )

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |

Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )

原文标题 Can Test-Time Memory Evolution Outperform Test-Time Training for Scientific Discovery?
引用来源 arXiv cs.AI
本地存档 2026-10-28 15:39
引用格式 Yepeng Liu, Shengmai Chen, Xuandong Zhao, Chengzhi Liu, Dawn Song, Xin Eric Wang. Can Test-Time Memory Evolution Outperform Test-Time Training for Scientific Discovery?. 2026-10-26. https://www.ai007.site/news/35699

本文内容由 ai007 从公开渠道聚合,版权归原作者所有。若原文已删除或变更, 以原文站为准;本站存档仅为便于查阅而保留。