Decompose, Don't Expand: Capability-Independent AI Systems by Construction

arXiv cs.AI 约 12 分钟读完

A recurring design choice in building AI systems is whether, when a task is too hard for a model, to expand the model (make it larger, better-prompted, fine-tuned), or to decompose the task (extract the parts that admit a deterministic solution to a host, leaving the model only the irreducibly fuzzy…

Authors: Tejaswi Gowda

View a PDF of the paper titled Decompose, Don't Expand: Capability-Independent AI Systems by Construction, by Tejaswi Gowda

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

Abstract: A recurring design choice in building AI systems is whether, when a task is too hard for a model, to expand the model (make it larger, better-prompted, fine-tuned), or to decompose the task (extract the parts that admit a deterministic solution to a host, leaving the model only the irreducibly fuzzy residue). We make three claims. First, that many tasks commonly delegated whole to a model are in fact deterministic tasks with a small generative core. Second, and our central empirical result, that decomposing such a task yields a measurable and desirable property we call parity by construction: on the extracted sub-tasks the model-size performance curve becomes flat, because no model performs them at all. We measure this across nine models spanning a 494M-parameter local checkpoint to a frontier Opus-class model, a thirty-fold parameter range on the local family alone: once the host resolves the context, operation selection scores identically for all nine models and selector resolution for eight of nine, while the one task that does not decompose, labelling, remains sloped across the same range. Because the task leaves the model, a stock checkpoint suffices: no task-specific training and no fine-tuning. Third, that this is a general design discipline, not a domain trick: we show the same move recurring across physics setup, motion retargeting, and object-model editing, and in a Web-CLI tool family (same author, so not an independent replication). We give a method for locating the cut, the construction that makes a cut exist (a deterministic surface and a closed grammar over it), and a way to make the residue safe (resolve the deterministic context; verify the generative output), position the work against neuro-symbolic AI, tool-augmented language models, and generate-and-verify approaches, and are explicit about what is measured (one domain) versus illustrative (the rest).

Subjects:

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)

Cite as:

arXiv:2610.38144 [cs.AI]

(or

arXiv:2610.38144v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.38144

Focus to learn more

arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Tejaswi Gowda PhD [ view email ]

[v1]

Wed, 28 Oct 2026 01:28:24 UTC (219 KB)

Full-text links:

Access Paper:

View a PDF of the paper titled Decompose, Don't Expand: Capability-Independent AI Systems by Construction, by Tejaswi Gowda

View PDF

HTML (experimental)

TeX Source

view license

Ancillary-file links:

Ancillary files ( details ) :

RESULTS.md

anc-README.txt

eval-results.jsonl

Additional Features

Audio Summary

Current browse context:

cs.AI

< prev

next >

new

recent

| 2026-10

Change to browse by:

cs

cs.HC

References & Citations

SciX

Google Scholar

Semantic Scholar

export BibTeX citation

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...

Data provided by:

Bookmark

Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle

Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? )

Connected Papers Toggle

Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? )

Litmaps Toggle

Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? )

scite.ai Toggle

scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? )

Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle

alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? )

Links to Code Toggle

CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? )

DagsHub Toggle

DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? )

GotitPub Toggle

Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? )

Huggingface Toggle

Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? )

ScienceCast Toggle

ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? )

Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle

Replicate ( What is Replicate? )

Spaces Toggle

Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? )

Spaces Toggle

TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? )

Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower

Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? )

Core recommender toggle

CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? )

Author

Venue

Institution

Topic

About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs .

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? |

Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? )

原文标题 Decompose, Don't Expand: Capability-Independent AI Systems by Construction
引用来源 arXiv cs.AI
本地存档 2026-10-31 12:12
引用格式 Tejaswi Gowda. Decompose, Don't Expand: Capability-Independent AI Systems by Construction. 2026-10-31. https://www.ai007.site/news/83174

本文内容由 ai007 从公开渠道聚合,版权归原作者所有。若原文已删除或变更, 以原文站为准;本站存档仅为便于查阅而保留。